[SystemSafety] qualification (was: Re: RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"
Gergely Buday
gbuday at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 18:02:51 CEST 2013
Reading a bit about safety critical software I noticed a fundamental
problem, namely, when software engineers lack physics education.
Unbelievable errors come when programmers take for granted a too simple
model of physical reality. Logic is not enough.
- Gergely
On 27 June 2013 17:53, Martyn Thomas <martyn at thomas-associates.co.uk> wrote:
> I recall that there are a few engineering standards that require that
> the chief engineer on a project is Chartered. That might be a good start
> ...
>
> Martyn
>
> On 27/06/2013 12:35, Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
> > Scenarios such as those Bertrand describes are not that far-fetched.
> Unfortunately, there are in some places senior management who are in the
> same state of (lack of) expertise as Bertrand describes. That is a problem
> of professional qualification which I would prefer to treat as a separate
> issue.
>
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20130627/9108ac2b/attachment.html>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list