[SystemSafety] Fwd: Contextualizing & Confirmation Bias
Peter Bernard Ladkin
ladkin at rvs.uni-bielefeld.de
Wed Feb 5 22:59:12 CET 2014
On 2/5/14 10:02 PM, Derek M Jones wrote:
> I gave Millikan as an example because of his belief
> about what the value of the charge should, not that a
> smallest unit of charge existed.
Well, yes, quite so. A suggestion of confirmation bias, indeed any bias, does require one to state
the belief system of (a) the subject; (b) oneself; and (c) the intellectual environment which one
assumes. Two or more of which are often missing.
> The cognitive psychology books sitting on my shelf appear to use
> conformation bias in the Bertrand Russell Turkey sense.
Russell's turkeys fit my notion to a tee, as far as I can see.
> However, the "MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences"
> says (much to my surprise):
> "That is, subjects will conduct an experiment
> that will generate a result that is predicted by their hypothesis.
> This is known as confirmation bias"
Yes, well, that's what happens when people throw trendy terms around in papers. What's that I read
above, "MIT"? Why do I feel confirmation bias coming on? :-)
PBL
Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list