[SystemSafety] Fwd: Contextualizing & Confirmation Bias

Matthew Squair mattsquair at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 00:57:59 CET 2014


Which is kind of the point of the scientific method isn't it? Just because
'you' amass a body of evidence in support of 'your' hypothesis doesn't mean
it's accepted, only after others have tested it, ideally using different
methods and come up with the same results will it be considered acceptable.

Taking a recent example, Boeing and the FAA formed a hypothesis about the
safety of Lithium batteries, they tested to verify that hypothesis
(conducted type tests per the FAA's guidance), published their results
(it's all good, here's the type certificate), then had others (the
airlines) independently test their hypothesis, via other means (real world
operational experience), only to find their hypothesis was disproven (a
number of fires in service for reasons not wholly anticipated reasons and
with greater than expected severity).

A triumph of the scientific method over experimenters regress, or
confirmation bias if you like.


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Derek M Jones <derek at knosof.co.uk> wrote:

> Peter,
>
>
>  Well, yes, quite so. A suggestion of confirmation bias, indeed any bias,
>> does require one to state
>> the belief system of (a) the subject; (b) oneself; and (c) the
>> intellectual environment which one
>> assumes. Two or more of which are often missing.
>>
>
> and confirmation bias does not disappear just because a person's
> belief is found to agree with reality.
>
> All of the turkeys suffered from confirmation bias, including the
> one that is pardoned.
>
> All of the students suffer from confirmation bias, independently
> of whether or not the postgrads had switched on the magnetic
> field generator.
>
>
> --
> Derek M. Jones                  tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667
> Knowledge Software Ltd          blog:shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com
> Software analysis               http://www.knosof.co.uk
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
>



-- 
*Matthew Squair*
MIEAust CPEng

Mob: +61 488770655
Email: MattSquair at gmail.com
Website: www.criticaluncertainties.com <http://criticaluncertainties.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20140206/d702d9a9/attachment.html>


More information about the systemsafety mailing list