[SystemSafety] Stupid Software Errors [was: Overflow......]

Martyn Thomas martyn at thomas-associates.co.uk
Mon May 4 16:05:56 CEST 2015


Was this 8 months of simulation, to find an overflow error that static
analysis could find in seconds?

It may even be true that the developers assumed correctly that noone
would fly for 8 months without powering off the generators - in which
case their fault may have just been not documenting that assumption as a
requirement.

Martyn

On 04/05/2015 13:31, Matthew Squair wrote:
> On the other hand I don't think we should loose sight of the fact that
> the Boeing 'bug' was found by running a long duration simulation, not
> by an airliner falling out of the sky. So perhaps thanks is due to the
> Boeing safety or software engineer(s) who insisted on a long run
> endurance test and who might have actually learned something from history?
>  
>



More information about the systemsafety mailing list