[SystemSafety] How Many Miles of Driving Would It Take to Demonstrate Autonomous Vehicle Reliability?
Peter Bishop
pgb at adelard.com
Mon Apr 18 09:25:52 CEST 2016
Re the practicality of testing, the important metric might be the number
of *crashes* rather than fatalities. After all there are a lot of
features inside the car that stop a crash escalating to a fatality (like
seat belts and air bags). These won't go away if cars become driverless.
According to the Rand graph, we would need 1 million miles for a 95%
confidence that the driverless car crash rate is a least as good as a
driven one.
i.e. a fleet of 100 cars driving 10000 miles each for one year.
Peter Bishop
Adelard
On 14/04/2016 20:52, Robert Schaefer wrote:
> http://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/04/car-makers-cant-drive-their-way-to-safety-with-self-driving-cars/
> http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1478.html
>
> Question: Is there any sort of correlation between the study of safety
> in software in avionics and and the study of safety in software in
> automobiles?
>
> I mean, are we (historically speaking) repeating ourselves? - The first
> as tragedy, the second as farce?
>
> bob s
> rps at haystack.mit <mailto:rps at haystack.mit>.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
>
--
Peter Bishop
Chief Scientist
Adelard LLP
Exmouth House, 3-11 Pine Street, London,EC1R 0JH
http://www.adelard.com
Recep: +44-(0)20-7832 5850
Direct: +44-(0)20-7832 5855
Registered office: Stourside Place, Station Road, Ashford, Kent TN12 1PP
Registered in England & Wales no. OC 304551. VAT no. 454 489808
This e-mail, and any attachments, is confidential and for the use of
the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please
telephone 020 7832 5850. We do not accept legal responsibility for
this e-mail or any viruses.
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list