[SystemSafety] Does "reliable" mean "safe" and or "secure" or neither?
Ross Hannan - Sigma
ross_hannan at sigma-aerospace.com
Sun Apr 24 01:19:35 CEST 2016
I really don't understand why this list needs to degrade in to abuse on a regular basis and why certain members of this list seem to see others as fodder for these abusive attacks.
Ross Hannan
Some Sort of Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: systemsafety [mailto:systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de] On Behalf Of Peter Bernard Ladkin
Sent: 23 April 2016 19:27
To: The System Safety List
Subject: Re: [SystemSafety] Does "reliable" mean "safe" and or "secure" or neither?
On 2016-04-23 19:43 , Nick Tudor wrote:
> DO-178C
In the absence of a complete sentence, let me suggest one.
---- DO178C sees no need to assign any meaning to the term "software reliability".
It's fine for some industry consortium to find it has no use for a specific concept. RTCA likely has no use for the notion of a cup of tea, either (BS6008). But that doesn't mean it makes any sense to argue that there isn't any such thing as a cup of tea.
PBL
Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list