[SystemSafety] Does "reliable" mean "safe" and or "secure" or neither?

Peter Bernard Ladkin ladkin at rvs.uni-bielefeld.de
Sun Apr 24 22:08:52 CEST 2016



On 2016-04-24 20:43 , paul_e.bennett at topmail.co.uk wrote:
> To prove integrity, I think, requires applying some stress to the system
> above and beyond the normal specification with the expectation that
> the system would still behave in a rational manner. 

That's resilience. Often taken to be different from integrity.

PBL


Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany
Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319  www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20160424/035a8666/attachment.pgp>


More information about the systemsafety mailing list