[SystemSafety] Off Topic
Michael J. Pont
M.Pont at SafeTTy.net
Fri Jun 24 21:04:29 CEST 2016
Peter,
This is a very sad day for many of us in what is (at least at present) the
UK.
Some of us perhaps deserve your "factoid" (but not all of us do).
Many of us are suffering a sense of what feels like bereavement - where do
you go when your country leaves you?
(Only after that do you start to consider what is going to happen to your
business, your pension, etc.)
All the best,
Michael.
-----Original Message-----
From: systemsafety
[mailto:systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de] On Behalf Of
Peter Bernard Ladkin
Sent: 24 June 2016 19:43
To: systemsafety at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
Subject: Re: [SystemSafety] Off Topic
On 2016-06-24 09:42 , Andreoli, Kevin (UK) wrote:
> "As ye sow, so shall ye reap"
>
> Hollande, Merkel and their predecessors sowed intransigence and have
reaped yesterday's vote in the UK.
Intransigence in not being ready to change the founding documents, the
Treaties of Rome and Maasstricht, on the basis of a request from one member
out of 27 signatories? I would hope so.
That's the role which founding documents are supposed to play.
In any case, if it's true that their intransigence led to yesterday's vote,
then both of them should be celebrating wildly, because they no longer even
have to listen to the request.
But the champagne corks are not popping in Paris and Berlin.
The factoid making the rounds in Bielefeld today (in and out of academic
circles) is that UK Google searches for "Brexit" remained low until late
last night, and then spiked. The conclusion people draw is that Britons
voted, and when they got home they looked up what they had just done. That
does not bode well for the tenor of exit negotiations. Neither does the
sight of British football hooligans trashing Marseille (again), shouting
"f*** you, we're out" and two weeks later having that happen.
The other conclusion being drawn is something learnt in Germany 80 years
ago, and whose current constitution expressly forbids. Don't "decide" major
political issues by referendum. You can't plan for what you'll get, voters
often don't know what they are voting for, and you have to act on it right
away. Also, referenda enable power distortion. Farage can't get elected to
parliament. But he can get the Prime Minister to resign, change the course
of Britain's economic development for at least the next twenty years, and
(wait for it) break up the Union.
According to the stats, it would not be amiss to put the result down to
selfish old people who don't care a fig about the young.
It is amiss, though to put the result down to Tory "Little Englanders", as
Martin McGuinness did and Tim Farron hinted. 44% of McGuinness's populace
voted for Brexit and obviously none of them are Tory "Little Englanders".
PBL
Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany MoreInCommon Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs-bi.de
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list