[SystemSafety] A Critical-System Assurance Manifesto
Peter Bishop
pgb at adelard.com
Thu Dec 14 00:08:13 CET 2017
On 13/12/2017 19:05, Les Chambers wrote:
> Peter
> Re: The theory also shows that adding adding some extra "padding" tests to
> low probability demands reduces the sensitivity to profile change.
>
> What does this mean?
>
> It reminds me of the time, back in the day, when I was down in Texas looking at a massive distillation column, the like of which the world had not seen before. I asked one of the engineers, " how did you possibly conceive of the design of that thing. "
> He answered,"We eyeballed it!"
Here are some slides that summarise the main points in the journal paper
Peter
>
> Les
>
>> On 14 Dec 2017, at 3:14 am, Peter Bishop <pgb at adelard.com> wrote:
>>
>> The theory also shows that adding adding some extra "padding" tests to
>> low probability demands reduces the sensitivity to profile change.
>
--
Peter Bishop
Chief Scientist
Adelard LLP
24 Waterside, 44-48 Wharf Rd, London N1 7UX
http://www.adelard.com
Recep: +44-(0)20-7832 5850
Direct: +44-(0)20-7832 5855
Registered office: Stourside Place, Station Road, Ashford, Kent TN12 1PP
Registered in England & Wales no. OC 304551. VAT no. 454 489808
This e-mail, and any attachments, is confidential and for the use of
the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please
telephone 020 7832 5850. We do not accept legal responsibility for
this e-mail or any viruses.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_and Confidence_v7.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 185829 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20171213/02fd4dc8/attachment-0001.pdf>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list