[SystemSafety] Looking for information about safety-critical software faults in road vehicles

[Mario Gleirscher]

Thanks Michael,

"The question that this lawsuit may help clarify is how soon automakers
must disclose potential safety issues caused by software bugs."

That does indirectly also address the RCA doc question "How deep are we
required/regulated to go with RCA?" raised by Peter couple of days ago.

Have a good day,
Mario


On 23/08/18 06:35, Michael J. Pont wrote:
> This case was highlighted on another list and may be of interest:
> https://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/computing/software/court-allows-lawsuit-to-proceed-against-fiat-chrysler-over-software-flaw
> 
> Michael J. Pont
> SafeTTy Systems Ltd
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: systemsafety [mailto:systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de] On Behalf Of Martyn Thomas
> Sent: 11 August 2018 10:11
> To: systemsafety at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
> Subject: [SystemSafety] Looking for information about safety-critical software faults in road vehicles
> 
> Other than the "uncommanded acceleration" reports and the remote control of vehicles by researchers, can anyone give me details of safety-critical software faults discovered in road vehicle software?
> 
> I well understand that manufacturers may have corrected such faults (or
> not) without a recall or publicity and that details may be very sensitive. I will give strong assurances of confidentiality - I'm just trying to understand the scale of known issues.
> 
> Martyn
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5053 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20180823/24445cff/attachment-0001.bin>