[SystemSafety] Collected stopgap measures
Derek M Jones
derek at knosof.co.uk
Sat Nov 17 22:12:34 CET 2018
Paul,
> Just because Boehm's works are rather large, and widely cited, doesn't
> make them correct.
It shows the power of promoting one's work, which Boehm does heavily.
> Laurent Bossavit went all the way down to the bottom a couple of the
> rabbit holes in [1], and from that research Boehm was apparently just as
> prone to fallacious thinking as the rest of us.
>
> [1] https://leanpub.com/leprechauns
This is a great book.
Boehm's original analysis was based on a sample of 63 projects.
Large when he wrote his book, but small by today's standards.
He over-fits this data and quotes accuracy to two decimal places,
while the data has a standard error at the level of one-digit
accuracy.
There is also mistake in the fitting of one of his models:
https://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2016/05/19/cocomo-how-not-to-fit-a-model-to-data/
I find this very surprising, given the data has been public for almost
40 years. Why has nobody thought to check it and raise the issue?
--
Derek M. Jones Software analysis
tel: +44 (0)1252 520667 blog:shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list