[SystemSafety] Critical systems Linux
Peter Bernard Ladkin
ladkin at causalis.com
Wed Nov 21 08:56:04 CET 2018
On 2018-11-21 08:45 , Matthew Squair wrote:
> Hi Peter, could you expand on your last point please?
The regulators can approve certain software as appropriate for certain purposes without the SW
having to be assessed (again) each time it is used. See for example FAA 8110.91 - Guidelines for the
Qualification of Software Tools Using Rtca Do-178b at
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/12747
PBL
Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
MoreInCommon
Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs-bi.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20181121/7f3fd7ab/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list