[SystemSafety] Critical systems Linux

Peter Bernard Ladkin ladkin at causalis.com
Wed Nov 21 08:56:04 CET 2018



On 2018-11-21 08:45 , Matthew Squair wrote:
> Hi Peter, could you expand on your last point please? 

The regulators can approve certain software as appropriate for certain purposes without the SW
having to be assessed (again) each time it is used. See for example FAA 8110.91 - Guidelines for the
Qualification of Software Tools Using Rtca Do-178b at
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/12747

PBL

Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
MoreInCommon
Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319  www.rvs-bi.de





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20181121/7f3fd7ab/attachment.sig>


More information about the systemsafety mailing list