[SystemSafety] Personal and corporate liabilities as a consequence of safety, security and other mistakes of similar importance
Martyn Thomas
martyn at thomas-associates.co.uk
Thu Oct 4 14:34:53 CEST 2018
Perhaps the stronger "forbidden for use in ..." would be a better phrase.
Martyn
On 04/10/2018 12:49, paul_e.bennett at topmail.co.uk wrote:
> Perhaps all software developers should include the 'Not Warranted for Use
> in Systems where Safety or Security are issues without consultation with
> the author' type statements in the comments of their source code.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20181004/0395116a/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list