[SystemSafety] Another question
Olwen Morgan
olwen.morgan at btinternet.com
Thu Sep 20 14:34:06 CEST 2018
Another baffler:
Lots of developers have software processes that are not truly fit for
purpose. (A good, simple diagnostic sign is to look at the technical
effectiveness of error-prevention and -detection measures at each stage
of the process.) Hardly surprising, then, that in such processes a lot
of errors are left to be discovered in testing. Now the question:
If your testing keeps on taking longer than you planned, *why do people
pay only lip-service to adopting coding styles that seek proactively to
minimise the size of relevant test coverage domains?*
Obviously, the best course is to strength error detection everywhere in
the process, but actively minimising the size of coverage domains makes
economic sense if you rely mostly on testing to find bugs.
O
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20180920/f157ff31/attachment.html>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list