[SystemSafety] Post Office Horizon System
Peter Bernard Ladkin
ladkin at causalis.com
Mon Apr 26 21:04:13 CEST 2021
On 2021-04-26 20:26 , Steve Tockey wrote:
>
> ... But the question still remains in
> the general case: more and more software is being delivered which is leading to material harm to the
> general public—when will the developers and/or suppliers of such faulty software be held accountable
> and liable?
One possible outcome of the Horizon case is that the notion of strict liability for software is
being given a serious airing. The liability is not at the level of individuals but at the level of
the developing organisation.
It is going to be hard to relegate a subtle technical problem to the mercy of the courts, though.
Requirements specification is an unsolved engineering problem, and is likely to remain so for quite
a while (if not for ever). Software systems are often used outside of formal requirements.
So introduction of strict liability could lead to the situation in which developers communicate
formally over-strict requirements on the use of their product. Suppose someone uses that product
outside those formally over-strict requirements. Developer points the finger at user, and, with a
good legal department, wins in court.
Whereas the user might well have been using the system for its intellectually-intended purpose,
where it failed and caused harm. In circumstances in which there was not strict liability and
formally over-strict requirements, that might have led to a negotiation in which the developer
agreed to accept some responsibility for the harm caused.
I agree with your examples, of course, especially the one in which you quote me back at myself :-)
PBL
Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
ClaireTheWhiteRabbit RIP
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs-bi.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/pipermail/systemsafety/attachments/20210426/694a7f55/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list