[SystemSafety] IEC 61508 Committee Draft of Edition 3 published
Peter Bernard Ladkin
ladkin at causalis.com
Wed Oct 5 15:45:38 CEST 2022
On 2022-10-04 20:28 , Derek M Jones wrote:
>
> One major problem is the almost complete lack of
> empirical software testing research.
Like the "complete lack" exhibited by the work of Boehm, Adams and Humphrey (and, if you like,
extended by Thayer et al).
I am glad you acknowledged them. It shows, I think, that one cannot take your comments such as the
one above at all seriously. Which was my point.
But then you seem to want people to read what you write, referencing your URLs. And at the same time
you spout nonsense such as the above, and are then content to acknowledge - indeed expand upon - the
obvious counterexamples. It's contradictory - why would anybody want to read anything written by
somebody who does this? (Except of course for amusement on a mailing list, for which I thank you.)
PBL
Prof. i.R. Dr. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs-bi.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/pipermail/systemsafety/attachments/20221005/83d96f09/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list