[SystemSafety] Difference between software reliability and astrology
Derek M Jones
derek at knosof.co.uk
Tue Aug 13 16:54:30 CEST 2024
Paul,
> From previous discussions here and elsewhere (and prior consideration of ISO26262) I was under the impression that
> software is 'generally recognised' to be (ideally) deterministic?
Yes, ideally deterministic, not actually deterministic,
but still practically deterministic for many tasks.
Background radiation (e.g., cosmic rays) is likely to flip
1-bit in 4G os memory every 33 hours
https://shape-of-code.com/2013/12/13/unreliable-cpus-and-memory-the-end-result-of-moores-law/
--
Derek M. Jones Evidence-based software engineering
blog:https://shape-of-code.com
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list