[SystemSafety] Difference between software reliability and astrology
Paul Sherwood
paul.sherwood at codethink.co.uk
Wed Aug 21 11:59:33 CEST 2024
On 2024-08-21 10:30, Prof. Dr. Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
>>>> "We conclude that establishing the reliability of RTOS practically
>>>> using the Bernoulli/Poisson mathematics in this manner looks close
>>>> to infeasible. Yet Annex D currently states in its second sentence
>>>> “This approach is considered particularly appropriate as part of the
>>>> qualification of operating systems, [etc.]” !
>>>>
>>>> It seems to me that for complex software in general, we'll need
>>>> something better?
>>>
>>> Better? Like what?
>>
>> https://mathworld.wolfram.com/BayesianAnalysis.html perhaps?
>
> That is a category mistake. Bayesian analysis is a form of statistical
> inference, it's not a collection of different stochastic processes.
If I'm misusing the terminology, I apologise. My point was that,
accepting the likely infeasibility of using "Bernoulli/Poisson
mathematics", we look for an alternative. It seems to me that we may be
able to apply a Bayesian approach in that search.
br
Paul
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list