<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/11/2020 13:26, Michael Holloway
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAB_B+Uaiemxf8GvHXXEQ=D_B89fOm+=wJ=fbsLWBEW5fX5UiAg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:large">Second, it
is irresponsible moralizing to claim that making such a
statement is irresponsible, inappropriate, technically
indefensible, misleading, or any of the other bad things
attributed to it. If the statement had been written in a
technical paper, without any qualifiers explaining "100%
confident" was being used in the colloquial sense, then
criticism would be warranted. It wasn't. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>As I said in a considered technical opinion offered to an FAA
employee at a conference in November last year, "Bullsh!t". If I
want computer-moderated aerodynamic instability, I'll fly in an
Su-35. What the 737 MAX needs isn't revamped systems but a new
airframe design.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Period.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Olwen</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>