<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cordia New";
panose-1:2 11 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:DengXian;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@DengXian";
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="DE" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Olwen, Peter,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I know the best solution is to have stable physical behavior without electronics. Nose up compensation for 737 MAX with MCAS is just a work around.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I would not compare avionics with automotive, but the first A-class Mercedes passed the elch test only with adding stability control like ESP system
from Bosch. Never heard any complains after it.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Dietmar</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">KINALZYK</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><br>
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Principal Development Engineer</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><br>
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Product Safety & NON-PT Safety<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">AVL Software and Functions GmbH<br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Im Gewerbepark B29</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">,
</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">93059</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Regensburg</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Germany</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><br>
</span><a href="www.avl-functions.com"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">www.avl-functions.com</span></a><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Von:</b> systemsafety <systemsafety-bounces@lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>
<b>Im Auftrag von </b>Olwen Morgan<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Sonntag, 22. <span lang="EN-US">November 2020 16:59<br>
<b>An:</b> systemsafety@lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de<br>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [SystemSafety] "FAA chief '100% confident' of 737 MAX safety as flights to resume"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">On 22/11/2020 15:48, Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br>
<br>
On 2020-11-22 15:49 , Olwen Morgan wrote: <br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br>
... the FAA is likely to have been under pressure to accede to demands not to require solution of the problem in the physics.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-US">Not in the slightest.
<br>
<br>
There would not have been such demands. There is no scope, either in FAA or EASA certification regulations, for requiring a specific kind of solution to an issue where a requirement is not fulfilled.
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-US">What charmingly disingenuous weasel-wording!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">Both Boeing and the FAA know that fixing the physics is technically the best solution. My belief on this is that Boeing told the FAA (<i>sub rosa</i>) that they didn't want to pay for the best solution and the FAA obligingly rolled over
(again).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">Still harbouring no intention of flying in a recertified 737 MAX,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p>Olwen<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>