[SystemSafety] "FAA chief '100% confident' of 737 MAX safety as flights to resume"
Olwen Morgan
olwen at phaedsys.com
Sun Nov 22 16:59:20 CET 2020
On 22/11/2020 15:48, Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-11-22 15:49 , Olwen Morgan wrote:
>>
>> ... the FAA is likely to have been under pressure to accede to
>> demands not to require solution of the problem in the physics.
> Not in the slightest.
>
> There would not have been such demands. There is no scope, either in
> FAA or EASA certification regulations, for requiring a specific kind
> of solution to an issue where a requirement is not fulfilled.
>
>
What charmingly disingenuous weasel-wording!
Both Boeing and the FAA know that fixing the physics is technically the
best solution. My belief on this is that Boeing told the FAA (/sub
rosa/) that they didn't want to pay for the best solution and the FAA
obligingly rolled over (again).
Still harbouring no intention of flying in a recertified 737 MAX,
Olwen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/pipermail/systemsafety/attachments/20201122/226f6ff8/attachment.html>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list