[SystemSafety] "FAA chief '100% confident' of 737 MAX safety as flights to resume"
Olwen Morgan
olwen at phaedsys.com
Mon Nov 23 17:02:46 CET 2020
On 23/11/2020 15:37, Kinalzyk, Dietmar AVL/DE wrote:
>
> Olwen, Peter,
>
> I know the best solution is to have stable physical behavior without
> electronics. Nose up compensation for 737 MAX with MCAS is just a work
> around.
>
> I would not compare avionics with automotive, but the first A-class
> Mercedes passed the elch test only with adding stability control like
> ESP system from Bosch. Never heard any complains after it.
>
If a Mercedes crashes, it is likely to kill considerably fewer than 200
people at at time. ... But consider the following dialogue, which comes
in two versions:
Version 1:
Aeronautical engineer: We've cocked-up the physical design.
Manager: No problem. We can fix it in
the software.
Lumpen software engineer: OK. we'll do it that way.
Version 2:
Aeronautical engineer: We've cocked-up the physical
design.
Manager: No problem. We can fix
it in the software.
Conscientious software engineer: F*** OFF! ...
Why should software engineers be asked, on a hiding to nothing, to
correct the errors made by engineers in other disciplines?
... alas, too many clowns and not enough circuses ...
Olwen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/pipermail/systemsafety/attachments/20201123/bc29e953/attachment.html>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list